Cases 51 - 60 of 124
Ford County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners v. Allergan PLC et al
as 6:2020cv01262
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Dillon Companies, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ford County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2020cv02469
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP doing business as Wal-Mart Stores East I, L.P. and Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Faye Hill Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Sam's East Inc et al
as 5:2020cv00920
Defendant:
Sam's East Inc and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Beverly Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Moore v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 5:2020cv00913
Plaintiff:
Chiquita Moore
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wendt et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv02432
Plaintiff:
Brandon Wendt and Summer Wendt
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jones v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 5:2020cv00838
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Plaintiff:
Debra Ann Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dean v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 6:2020cv00287
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Cordero Dean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clubfoot v. Wal Mart Stores East LP
as 5:2020cv00785
Defendant:
Wal Mart Stores East LP doing business as Wal-Mart Store #150
Plaintiff:
Hugh Clubfoot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Leathers et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP et al
as 5:2020cv00731
Plaintiff:
Imareon Leathers and Latoya Leathers
Defendant:
Kathy LNU and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stamps v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
as 5:2020cv00721
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Stamps
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
