Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Hooks v. Kines
as 1:2019cv00733
Defendant:
Dwight Kines
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Armijo v. Peterson, et al
as 09-2114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARTHA ARMIJO, as parent and best friend of Christopher Armijo Sanchez
Defendant - Appellant:
ROB PETERSON, CHARLES HOOK, DARIO SOLIZ and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-2102
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hooks v. Martin et al
as 2:2009cv02167
Plaintiff:
Fernando F. Hooks and Fernando F. Hooks
Defendant:
Jace Martin, Robert Schluben, Brad Martens and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armijo v. Peterson et al
as 2:2009cv00090
Plaintiff:
Martha Armijo
Defendant:
Rob Peterson, Hook Charles, Soliz Dario and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-2102
Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
