Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Ackley v. Richardson et al
as 6:2017cv01108
Plaintiff:
Lindsay A. Ackley
Defendant:
Nephi Richardson, Barber, Kansas, County of, Comanche, Kansas, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Town of La Veta, et al
as 1:2014cv03273
Plaintiff:
William Carey Barber
Defendant:
Town of La Veta , Loren Youngers , Brian Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wright et al v. Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 6:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Wright and Charles Wright
Defendant:
Muskogee County Board of County Commissioners, Charles Pearson, Kent Barber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Margheim v. Buck et al
as 1:2012cv01520
Plaintiff:
Terry Margheim
Defendant:
Kenneth R. Buck, Emela Buljko, Greeley Police Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barber v. Henderson et al
as 4:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
Marvin L Barber
Defendant:
Jeff M Henderson, William A Yelton, Ron Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Barber County Attorney, et al
as 11-3251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEARLD BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBER COUNTY ATTORNEY and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BARBER COUNTY, KANSAS, for Barber County, Kansas
Brooks v. Barber County Attorney et al
as 6:2011cv01096
Plaintiff:
Gearld Brooks
Defendant:
Barber County Attorney and Barber County Board of Commissioners, Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
