Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Daniels v. Salazar et al
as 1:2014cv01796
Plaintiff:
Amanda Daniels
Defendant:
City of Walsenburg, The , John Salazar , Jim Chamberlain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pennington et al v. Salt Lake County et al
as 2:2010cv00497
Plaintiff:
Garry Pennington , Judy Pennington and Tyler Pennington
Defendant:
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake County District Attorney's Office, Lohra L. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Punchard, et al v. Sixth Judicial District Court, et al
as 08-2147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LORD PUNCHARD, Public Minister, ROYAL CONTINENTAL SUDAN AFRICA GOVERNMENT, DENECE WILLIAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, GARRY JEFFRIES, SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ASSISTANT ATTORNEY and others
Soto v. City of Ruidoso Downs et al
as 1:2008cv00568
Defendant:
City of Ruidoso Downs, Tom Armstrong, Garry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Soto
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Punchard et al v. Sixth Judicial District Court et al
as 1:2007cv01284
Plaintiff:
William Lord Punchard, Royal Continental, Denese Williams and others
Defendant:
Sixth Judicial District Court, Garry Jeffries, Sixth Judicial District Atty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
