Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Southern Nazarene University, et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 14-6026
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SOUTHERN NAZARENE UNIVERSITY, OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY, OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERISTY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, THOMAS E. PEREZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor, JACOB J. LEW, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA
Little Sisters of the Poor, et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 13-1540
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED, DENVER, COLORADO, a Colorado non-profit corporation, LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR, BALTIMORE, INC., a Maryland non-profit corporation, by themselves and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CHRISTIAN BROTHERS SERVICES, a New Mexico non-profit corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and others
Dobson et al v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2013cv03326
Plaintiff:
James C Dobson and Family Talk
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E. Perez, Jacob J. Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado et al v. Kathleen Sebelius et al
as 1:2013cv02611
Plaintiff:
Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colorado , Little Sisters of the Poor, Baltimore, Inc. , Christian Brothers Services and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Thomas E. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Southern Nazarene University et al v. Sebelius et al
as 5:2013cv01015
Plaintiff:
Southern Nazarene University , Oklahoma Wesleyan University , Oklahoma Baptist University and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Thomas E Perez, Jacob J Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 13-6215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID GREEN, MART GREEN, STEVE GREEN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Amicus Curiae:
SENATOR DANIEL COATS, SENATOR THAD COCHRAN, SENATOR MIKE CRAPO and others
Colorado Christian University v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2013cv02105
Plaintiff:
Colorado Christian University
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Hobby Lobby Stores, et al v. Sebelius, et al
as 12-6294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., MARDEL, INC., DAVID GREEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, HILDA SOLIS, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor and others
Colorado Christian University v. Sebelius et al
as 1:2011cv03350
Plaintiff:
Colorado Christian University
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Hilda Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
