Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Lovern v. Dorscheid et al
as 1:2013cv02446
Plaintiff:
Denny Lovern
Defendant:
Bart Dorscheid and Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Case v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2013cv00717
Plaintiff:
Janet Case
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque , Cole Knight and J. Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Handy v. Vigil et al
as 1:2013cv01963
Plaintiff:
Wyatt T. Handy, Jr.
Defendant:
Vigil, (I) Vigil, Ippel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carshall v. Leflore County Detention Center Public Trust et al
as 6:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
Felisha Carshall
Defendant:
Leflore County Detention Center Public Trust , Claude Jones , Kevin Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Melendrez, et al
as 13-2081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRESTON SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
BENJAMIN MELENDREZ, COLE KNIGHT, WILLIAM YOUNG and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv04016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Knight v. Comanche County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2013cv00179
Plaintiff:
Morris Knight
Defendant:
Comanche County Board of County Commissioners, Kenny Stradley and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lente, et al v. Stuedle, et al
as 1:2012cv00997
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lente
Defendant:
Tim Steudle , Craig Swagerty , Karen Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bernal v. Melendrez et al
as 1:2012cv00773
Plaintiff:
Michael Bernal
Defendant:
Benjamin Melendrez and Cole Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
