Cases 41 - 50 of 304
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6181
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Marker v. State of New Mexico, Office of the Secretary of State et al
as 2:2022cv00784
Plaintiff:
Larry Marker
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Office of the Secretary of State, State of New Mexico, Office of the Governor and State of New Mexico, Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hatten-Gonzales v. Scrase
as 22-2115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEBRA HATTEN-GONZALES, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID R. SCRASE, Secretary of the New Mexico Human Services Department
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Voter Reference Foundation, et al v. Balderas, et al
as 22-2101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VOTER REFERENCE FOUNDATION, LLC and HOLLY STEINBERG
Defendant / Appellant:
HECTOR H. BALDERAS, in his official capacity as New Mexico Attorney General and MAGGIE TOULOUSE-OLIVER, in her official capacity as New Mexico Secretary of State
McKaufman v. Child Support Services et al
as 5:2022cv00669
Plaintiff:
Deonte Martize McKaufman
Defendant:
Child Support Services, Amazon, Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3136
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
