Cases 51 - 60 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Phillips v. Jones et al
as 6:2013cv00338
Plaintiff:
Reginald L. Phillips
Defendant:
Justin Jones , Mike Mullin , Jim Rabon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Koch et al v. Juber et al
as 5:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
Felicia Koch , Amber Blevins , Ashley Bolding and others
Defendant:
David Juber, Jamie Baker, Gilbert Dildine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller, et al v. Hammer, et al
as 13-2106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANDREW J. MILLER
Plaintiff-Intervenor - Appellee:
ROBERTA BEALE
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBIN S. HAMMER
Defendant:
KEVIN D. ROWE, CARLA PEREZ, Detective #3096, CHADWICK J. MELVIN and others
v. Smith et al
as 1:2013cv00968
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Carla Havard, Terri Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Havard et al
as 1:2013cv00967
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Defendant:
Carla Havard, Terri Baker, Mr. A's Restaurant and Lounge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Havard et al
as 1:2013cv00969
Plaintiff:
Kevin Smith
Defendant:
Carla Havard, Terri Baker, Mr. A's Restaurant and Lounge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosser v. Rosser et al
as 5:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rosser
Defendant:
John Henry Rosser, III and Carla D Haddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Eden v. Lama et al
as 1:2011cv00465
Plaintiff:
James Wallace Eden
Defendant:
Albert Lama, Alex Romero, Alice Gandaradiaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerrero-Parada et al v. Turza et al
as 1:2011cv00740
Plaintiff:
Sugey Guerrero-Parada and Carla Soto-Guerrero
Defendant:
Steve Turza, Christopher Carter and Vanessa Hips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
