Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Poore v. Glanz et al
as 4:2011cv00797
Plaintiff:
Ladona A Poore
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz and Seth Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor, et al v. Roswell Independent School, et al
as 11-2242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SETH TAYLOR, JACOB COBOS, by and through his parents Ralph and Adrienne Cobos, COURTNEY RENTERIA, by and through her parent Cynthia Salmon and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSWELL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT and MICHAEL GOTTLIEB, in his capacity as Superintendent of Schools for Roswell Independent School District
Estate of James D. Redd, M.D. v. Love et al
as 2:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
Estate of James D. Redd, M.D.
Defendant:
Daniel Love, Dan Barnes, Brent Range and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burciaga-Segura et al v. The Board of Education of the Las Vegas City Schools et al
as 6:2010cv01086
Plaintiff:
Lisa A Burciaga-Segura , Michael Melton and Therese Melton
Defendant:
Board of Education of the Las Vegas City Schools , Richard E Romero , Pete Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
A.L.A. et al v. The Board of Education of the Las Vegas City Schools et al
as 1:2010cv00709
Plaintiff:
A.L.A., L.P.A., E.G.B. and others
Defendant:
The Board of Education of the Las Vegas City Schools , Richard E Romero, Pete Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Roswell Independent School District et al
as 2:2010cv00606
Plaintiff:
Seth Taylor , Jacob Cobos , Kyrah Graham and others
Defendant:
Roswell Independent School District and Michael Gottlieb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00539
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
