Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Blackmon v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Saundra Blackmon
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richter v. Nelson et al
as 4:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Denise Armstrong, Lesli Blazer, Cynthia Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan D Richter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Blackmon v. Sutton, et al
as 12-3204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON BLACKMON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARLA SUTTON, individually, NATASHA TYSON, individually, KEITH GUTIERREZ, individually and others
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SEDGWICK COUNTY, KANSAS
Blackmon v. Sutton, et al
as 12-3199
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANDON BLACKMON
Defendant - Appellant:
MARLA SUTTON, individually, NATASHA TYSON, individually, KEITH GUTIERREZ, individually and others
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SEDGWICK COUNTY, KANSAS
Sanchez et al v. Sanchez et al
as 2:2011cv00713
Plaintiff:
Leo Sanchez and Maria Seres
Defendant:
Allen Sanchez, Jr., Jon Moyers, Trey Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. Primer, et al
as 10-1191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENT C. NORMAN, AKA Robert Ketchum, AKA R. H. Ketchum, AKA Bob Ketchum, AKA Kent C. Norman
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD PRIMER, MD and 6 other unknown physicians, does one through six and each of them individually, and in their own capacities, JOHN KUNSTLE, BROADWAY PHARMACY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
