Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Meyer v. West Jordan City et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Sheri Meyer
Defendant:
West Jordan City, Nolan Butler, Ericka Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Libel,Assault,Slander
Keenan-Coniglio et al v. Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Operating Commission et al
as 1:2023cv01051
Plaintiff:
Laurel Keenan-Coniglio, Chase Bond, Austin Butler and others
Defendant:
Cumbres & Toltec Scenic Operating Commission, Cumbres & Toltec Operating, LLC, Marvin Casias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Butler v. Nance
as 2:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
Rhett Butler
Defendant:
Steve Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Butler v. Branscum et al
as 6:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Joshua Duane Bulter and Joshua Duane Butler
Defendant:
Kevin Branscum, McIntosh Co. Sheriff Dept and Matthew Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Butler v. Sequoyah County Sheriff Department et al
as 6:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Robey Lee Butler
Defendant:
Sequoyah County Sheriff Department, Brian Stone and Larry Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brunson v. Adams, et al
as 23-4042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOY ARLAN BRUNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ALMA S. ADAMS, PETE AGUILAR, COLIN Z. ALLRED and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv04015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
