Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Aragon v. Vander Dussen et al
as 2:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Paul Aragon
Defendant:
Judge Janemarie Vander Dussen, Curry County, Administrative Office of the Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Harris et al v. The City of Texico et al
as 2:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Nicole Harris and Paula Ashley
Defendant:
The City of Texico, Douglas Bowman, Christina Vannatta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 d (d Federally Assisted Programs)
Farr v. Curry et al
as 2:2022cv02120
Plaintiff:
Joan E. Farr
Defendant:
Christine Curry, Kansas Legal Services, Inc. and Rebecca Hesse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowland v. The Board of County Commissioners for the County of Curry
as 2:2020cv00646
Plaintiff:
Sean Rowland
Defendant:
The Board of County Commissioners for the County of Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Curry et al v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2020cv00116
Plaintiff:
Lisa Curry and Rhiannon Montoya
Defendant:
Marianna Vigil, Malcolm J. Gonzales, Robert Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. University of Central Oklahoma et al
as 5:2019cv00203
Plaintiff:
Justin Curry
Defendant:
University of Central Oklahoma and Nickolas Bobeck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gardner et al v. Defendant Placeholder
as 2:2019rf00156
Plaintiff:
Edson Gardner and Rylee R. Curry
Defendant:
Defendant Placeholder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
