Civil Rights Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Peterson, et al v. Lake, et al
as 14-6168
Plaintiff - Appellee: RAY L. PETERSON, by and through Susan Jones, next friend and attorney-in-fact and SUSAN K. JONES, by and through Susan Jones, next friend and attorney-in-fact
Defendant - Appellant: ED LAKE, Director of Oklahoma Department of Human Services and JOEL NICO GOMEZ, Director of Oklahoma Health Care Authority
Peterson et al v. Lake et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv01235
Plaintiff: Ray L Peterson and Susan K Jones
Defendant: Ed Lake and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Quick et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02578
Plaintiff: Wayne Andrews
Defendant: Gary Quick, Timothy Geithner, Douglas Shulman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01417
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv02202
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Andrews v. Huber, et al., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1171
Plaintiff - Appellant: WAYNE ANDREWS
Defendant - Appellee: TIMOTHY GEITHNER, DOUGLAS SHULMAN, OFFICER IN CHARGE OF COLLECTIONS and others
Andrews v. Geithner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01366
Plaintiff: Wayne Andrews
Defendant: Timothy Geithner, Douglas Shulman, Officer in Charge of Collections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv00189
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?