Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Walker, et al v. Corizon Health, et al
as 22-3110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERMAINE WALKER, individually and as administrator of the estate of Marques Davis, deceased and KATHLEEN FORSYTH, as Guardian Ad Litem of minor I.D.F.
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., FKA Correctional Medical Services
Defendant:
SOHAIB MOHIUDDIN, M.D., PAUL CORBIER, M.D., DEBRA LUNDRY, RN and others
Ellsworth v. City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
as 4:2019cv00034
Plaintiff:
Amanda Ellsworth
Defendant:
City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, City of Broken Arrow Police Officers 1-10 and Marque Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bruner-McMahon, et al v. County of Sedgwick, et al
as 13-3035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERA M. BRUNER-MCMAHON and KATHLEEN A. GULLEDGE, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Terry Albert Bruner, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MARQUE JAMESON
Defendant:
SEDGWICK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF SEDGWICK, a political subdivision of the State of Kansas, SEDGWICK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards-Flynn v. Yara et al
as 6:2008cv00186
Plaintiff:
Margaret D Edwards-Flynn
Defendant:
Cheryl Ann Yara, Matthew Sandoval, Henry O. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Simpson, et al v. University CO Bldr
as 1:2002cv02390
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Lisa Simpson and Anne Gilmore
Defendant:
University of Colorado at Boulder
Intervenor:
John Doe
Interested Party:
Denver Publishing Company, Marques Harris and Colt Brennan
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
