Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Woods v. Cheyenne WY et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Defendant:
Young, Cheyenne Police Department Officer, Joanne Young, Warren, Cheyenne Police Department Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Myron Martize Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Harrison v Norris
as 0:2021cv00152
Defendant:
Eric Norris and Cheyenne Police Department Peace Officer
Plaintiff:
David Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres et al v. Norris et al
as 2:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Eric Norris, C.K. Wood, City of Cheyenne and others
Plaintiff:
David Harrison, Torres Andre Maurice, Brian Kanzler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Worstell, et al
as 11-1327
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MITCHELL ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellant:
B. WORSTELL, (No. 2172) individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer and as an employee and/or agent of the Colorado Springs Police Department and the City of Colorado Springs, C. CALKINS, (No. 2047) individually and in his capacity as a paid peace officer and as an employee and/or agent of the Colorado Springs Police Department and the City of Colorado Springs and THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, in its capacity as a governmental entity and as the employer of Officers Worstell and Calkins and the Colorado Springs Police Department
Defendant:
COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, in its capacity as an agent and/or independent contractor of the City of Colorado Springs and LISA PIEL
Weigel, et al v. Cox, et al
as 05-8094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GLENN WEIGEL and DAVID WEIGEL, individually, and as co-personal representatives of the estate of Bruce James Weigel
Defendant - Appellee:
WYOMING HIGHWAY PATROL COLONEL JOHN COX, JOHN K. BROAD, individually and DEVAN HENDERSON, individually
Not A Party In Lower Court - Amicus Curiae:
OKLAHOMA COUNCIL ON LAW ENFORCEMENT EDUCATION AND TRAINING, ASSOCIATION OF COLORADO STATE PATROL PROFESSIONALS, CITY OF AURORA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
