Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Patterson v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carl Patterson
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Joseph Norwood, Connor Whitlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhoades v. Bowling et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Dayton Rhoades and Dusty Rhoades
Defendant:
Bret Bowling, Creek County Board of County Commissioners, Steven Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glasscock v. Kelsey et al
as 4:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
Steven Glasscock
Defendant:
Jason Kelsey and USPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Morrison v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gary Tyrone Morrison
Defendant:
Joel P Ward, Joel Burks, Robert Dobbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Triplet v. Henderson et al
as 5:2023cv00587
Plaintiff:
Steven Montrail Triplet
Defendant:
Timothy Henderson, Jimmy Harmon, Stephanie Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. Gourley et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Saadiq Long
Defendant:
Chief Wade Gourley, Officer FNU Bradley, Officer Dustin Fulton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Inhofe et al
as 4:2022cv00474
Defendant:
John Stitt, James M Inhofe, James Lankford and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jeremiah Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
