Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Leadership Institute et al v. Stokes et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Leadership Institute and Turning Point USA
Defendant:
Garnett Stokes, Joseph Silva, Timothy Stump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2117
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dixon v. Silva-Markham Partners et al
as 1:2022cv01558
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Dixon
Defendant:
Silva-Markham Partners, Koelble & Co. and Colorado Coalition for the Homeless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Silva-Markham Partners et al
as 1:2021cv01703
Defendant:
Jose Silva, Holly Jackson, Bobby Nathan and others
Plaintiff:
John King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Silva v. Perea et al
as 1:2021cv00729
Plaintiff:
Marvin Silva
Defendant:
Jesse Perea, Estevan Gallegos, Isaac Artiaga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Los Angeles County California et al
as 0:2020cv00246
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Counsel Cruz, Los Angeles County Counsel Castro-Silva, Los Angeles County Senior Engineer Fire and others
Plaintiff:
Maryann Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
C1.G. v. Siegfried et al
as 1:2019cv03346
Defendant:
Scott Siegfried, Chris Smith, Brynn Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Cl. G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
