Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,384
Heavener v. Harding
as 6:2024cv00105
Petitioner: John E Heavener and John E. Heavener
Defendant: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Milsap (PS) v. People of Colorado
as 1:2024cv00751
Petitioner: James E. Milsap
Respondent: People of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heavener v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00114
Petitioner: John E Heavener
Defendant: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arrington v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00265
Plaintiff: Derrek E Arrington
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons and DESIGNATION, SENTENCE, & COMPUTATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Frazier
as 24-3042
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JASON E. FRAZIER
Robertson v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3030
Plaintiff: JOSHUA JAMES ROBERTSON
Defendant: STATE OF KANSAS, KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROGER WERHOLTZ and others
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 1:2024cv00521
Plaintiff: Anthony Prescott
Defendant: Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Cotner
as 24-5022
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff: Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant: Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDonald (D 113183) v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv03019
Plaintiff: Sean E. McDonald
Defendant: Tommy Williams and Gregory Dimarzo
Interested Party: Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?