Cases 11 - 20 of 250
Toevs v. Milyard et al
as 1:2012cv02532
Plaintiff:
Janos Toevs
Defendant:
Kevin Milyard, Kevin (I) Milyard, Tom Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Clements, et al
as 12-1209
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEROY W. BAKER
Respondent - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, Director, Dept. of Corrections, KEVIN MILYARD, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Baker v. Clements, et al
as 12-1189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY W. BAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM CLEMENTS, Dir, DOC, KEVIN MILYARD, Warden, SCF and ALL OTHER JOHN AND JANE DOE MEDICAL STAFF RESPONSABLE [SIC]
Blake v. Webster, et al
as 12-1129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIDNEY M. BLAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIAN WEBSTER, JULIE FULLER, RYDER MAY and others
Alward v. Milyard et al
as 1:2012cv00878
Plaintiff:
Douglas James Alward
Defendant:
Kevin Milyard , Raymond Higgins , Christopher Fleckenstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Small v. Milyard, et al
as 12-1104
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE A. SMALL
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN MILYARD and JOHN SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Self v. Milyard, et al
as 12-1072
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL G. SELF
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN MILYARD, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Parker v. Milyard et al
as 1:2012cv00448
Plaintiff:
Keith Parker
Defendant:
Kevin Milyard, Ryan Long and Colorado Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Chapdelaine et al
as 1:2012cv00130
Petitioner:
Leo Simmons
Respondent:
John Chapdelaine, Kevin Milyard, People of the State of Colorado, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv00132
Petitioner:
Leroy W. Baker
Respondent:
Tom Clements , Kevin Milyard and John W. Suthers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.