Cases 191 - 200 of 49,672
Davis v. Payne
as 5:2024cv03074
Petitioner:
Matthew Evan Davis, Sr.
Respondent:
Kevin Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Weaver (ID 112321) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03073
Plaintiff:
Dalton Tyler Weaver
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Kansas Department of Corrections, Shannon Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. New Mexico Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Robert Barrett
Defendant:
New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Darrin Lynn Pickens
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Day et al
as 6:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Jones
Defendant:
Jeremy Day and Trisha Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Redd et al
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Manuel Alex Hernandez
Defendant:
Brian Redd, Bart Mortensen, Randall Honey and others
Interested Party:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Petitioner:
KEVIN K. OGDEN
Respondent:
NEIL TURNER, Warden, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Heide v. Kansas Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-3071
Plaintiff:
JAY STEVEN HEIDE
Defendant:
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF KANSAS, FNU CURRY and others
Johnson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00297
Petitioner:
Joe Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brodeur v. US Government
as 5:2024cv00306
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
US Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
