Cases 21 - 30 of 239
Samuels v. 21st Judicial Justice System
as 1:2022cv02509
Petitioner:
Eric L. Samuels
Respondent:
21st Judicial Justice System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Dartez v. Peters, et al
as 22-3155
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SAMUEL LEE DARTEZ, II
Defendant / Appellant:
RICK PETERS, ALEX R. TAYLOR, JASON S. BAILEY and others
Defendant:
MARK FRENCH, BRIAN JOHNSON, ROBERT W. DIERKS and others
Scott v. LNU
as 5:2022cv00605
Petitioner:
Samuel Nathaniel Scott
Respondent:
FNU LNU and Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Becker (ID 91177) v. Schnurr
as 5:2022cv03122
Petitioner:
Samuel M. Becker
Respondent:
Daniel Schnurr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bellamy v. Cline, et al
as 22-3106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE ALLEN BELLAMY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL L. CLINE, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility, RON BAKER, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, STUART BAILEY, Major, Lansing Correctional Facility and others
Samuels v. No Named Repondent
as 1:2022cv01347
Petitioner:
Eric L. Samuels
Respondent:
No Named Repondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. Farris
as 22-6067
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL MAX POWELL
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM FARRIS, Warden
Ford v. Lovette
as 1:2022cv00997
Petitioner:
Kelvin Ford
Respondent:
Samuel Lovette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Drinkert v. Johnston
as 5:2022cv03045
Petitioner:
Samuel D. Drinkert
Respondent:
Caroline Horton and Michael Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
