Cases 21 - 30 of 300
Ferrell (PS) v. Heeden
as 1:2023cv02353
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ferrell
Defendant:
Peter Heeden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford (PS) v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
Glendon Scott Crawford
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noe v. Ciolli
as 1:2023cv01809
Plaintiff:
Peter George Noe
Respondent:
Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chiwanga v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2023cv00141
Petitioner:
Jackson Peter Chiwanga
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chamberlain v. King
as 1:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peter Laurence Chamberlain
Defendant:
Alexis King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olsen v. Hudson
as 5:2023cv03083
Petitioner:
Peter Eugene Olsen, Jr.
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peters v. City and County of Denver et al
as 1:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Scott Peters
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Daniel Rodriguez, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pagan v. USA
as 1:2023cv00251
Petitioner:
Peter Pagan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Noe v. USA et al
as 1:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Peter Noe
Defendant:
USA, Jennifer Seroski and D. Oba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Askew v. United States
as 23-3046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEON HENDERSON ASKEW
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY OF LEAVENWORTH, GREGORY LNU, Health Services, USP Leavenworth, UNKNOWN STAFF, USP Leavenworth and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
