Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Conley v. Pryor, et al
as 15-3031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DEAN CONLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
REX PRYOR, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacity, KYLE DEERE, Associate Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacity, JOE PANTANO, M-Unit Counselor, Lansing Correctional Facility, in his official and individual capacity and others
Leek (ID 63523) v. Owegbo et al
as 5:2015cv03017
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Leek
Defendant:
Innocent Owegbo, Rex Prior, Jim Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nixon v. Pryor
as 15-3011
Petitioner - Appellant:
GRANT MICHAEL NIXON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN REX PRYOR
Long v. People of the United States of America
as 1:2015cv00092
Petitioner:
Gary Rex Long
Respondent:
People of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smith (ID 87984) v. Trapp et al
as 5:2014cv03220
Plaintiff:
Shawn D. Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Trapp, Danny W. Duft, James R. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Losee v. Gallegos, et al
as 14-4148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL GRANT LOSEE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MORRELL, PAUL GARDNER, LARRY BUSSIO and others
Long (ID 6002628) v. Simpson et al
as 5:2014cv03185
Plaintiff:
Marlin D. Long
Defendant:
Rick Simpson, Matt Bennett and Rex Pryor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez (ID 51459) v. Pryor et al
as 5:2014cv03167
Petitioner:
Ernestor S. Martinez
Respondent:
Rex Pryor and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McTigue (ID 66578) v. Pryor et al
as 5:2014cv03158
Petitioner:
Brian McTigue
Respondent:
Rex Pryor and Attorney General of Kansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kingsley (ID 54123) v. Pryor et al
as 5:2014cv03145
Petitioner:
Alan W. Kingsley
Respondent:
Rex Pryor and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
