Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Bankhead v. Jeneatti et al
as 2:2011cv00587
Plaintiff:
Fabian Lyle Bankhead
Defendant:
Jacob Jeneatti, FNU DeLora, Annie Tippetts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels-McDaniel v. Winder et al.
as 2:2010cv00727
Plaintiff:
Tyrone V. Daniels-McDaniel
Defendant:
James M. Winder, Scott Carver, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Winder et al
as 2:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
Arthur Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
James M. Winder, Scott Carter, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beauchaine v. Winder, et al
as 10-4029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS BEAUCHAINE
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES M. WINDER, Sheriff, individually and in official capacity, ROLLIN COOK, Chief, individually and in official capacity, MIKE THOMAS, Lieutenant, individually and in official capacity and others
Cobb v. Winder et al
as 2:2008cv00582
Plaintiff:
Brent Mayon Cobb
Defendant:
James M. Winder, Beau Babka, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cobb v. Winder et al
as 2:2008cv00279
Plaintiff:
Brent Mayon Cobb
Defendant:
James M. Winder, Beau Babka, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunlap v. Jones et al
as 6:2007cv00380
Plaintiff:
Marcus P. Dunlap
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Larry Rollins and Marty Sirmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beauchaine v. Winder et al
as 2:2007cv00657
Plaintiff:
Dennis Beauchaine
Defendant:
James M. Winder, Rollin Cook, Mike Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Mink et al
as 1:2007cv01821
Plaintiff:
Arthur W. Goodman
Defendant:
Ted Mink, Palansky, Stiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Kay County Jail et al
as 5:2007cv00507
Plaintiff:
Michael Rollins
Defendant:
Kay County Jail, Everette Vanhoesen and Stephanie Ringgold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
