Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Bond v. Regalado, et al
as 22-5065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AUSTIN BOND, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Mitchell Lee Godsey
Defendant / Appellee:
VIC REGALADO, in his official capacity, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF TULSA COUNTY, ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Paredes-Machado v. USA et al
as 1:2022cv01681
Plaintiff:
Marco Paredes-Machado
Defendant:
USA, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henard v. City of Denver et al
as 1:2022cv01505
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Henard
Defendant:
City of Denver, Denver Health, Seth Humphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henard v. City of Denver and County of Denver et al
as 1:2022cv01459
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Henard
Defendant:
City of Denver and County of Denver, Denver Health, Seth Humpries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tiefenback v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Seth Tiefenback
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Travis Trani, Ruth Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thirsk v. Elder et al
as 1:2021cv01205
Plaintiff:
Seth Adam Thirsk
Defendant:
Bill Elder, Alvin (I) Gillespil, Bill (I) Elder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Curry et al
as 5:2019cv00766
Plaintiff:
Chad William Reed
Defendant:
Kelly Curry, Rick Whitten, Captain FNU Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brock v. USA
as 4:2019cv00047
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Henry Seth Brock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Simmons v. Hibbert
as 4:2019cv00302
Plaintiff:
Seth Oren Simmons
Defendant:
Terry Hibbert, Harlan Moore and Delaware Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. USA
as 2:2019cv00140
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gabriel Seth Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
