Cases 31 - 40 of 644
Wood v. Sweet et al
as 5:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wood
Defendant:
Roudy Sweet, Aaron Swatzal, Shane Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Moses et al
as 5:2022cv00049
Plaintiff:
Vincent Dewayne Lewis
Defendant:
Sergant Shelia Moses, Micheal Brown, Sergant Patricia Duran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Williamson et al
as 5:2021cv01064
Plaintiff:
Christopher Addarryl Jones and Tupac David Shakur
Defendant:
Terrance Dennis, Kelsie Williamson, FNU Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. United States et al
as 5:2021cv01030
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Earnest Draper, Earnest Moncada and others
Respondent:
United States and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Farley v. Jones et al
as 5:2021cv01007
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Farley
Defendant:
Mike Jones, C Mayfield and Felicia Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Kay County Justice Facilities Authority et al
as 5:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Ramirez
Defendant:
Kay County Justice Facilities Authority a public trust doing business as Kay County Detention Center, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Callie Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Crow
as 6:2021cv00276
Petitioner:
Rick L. Jones
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Pedigrew
as 5:2021cv00614
Petitioner:
Homer Jones
Respondent:
FNU Pedigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Wellpath Inc, FNU Smith, Rita Hood and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knighten v. Tulsa County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
DeWayne Herndon Knighten, Herndon DeWayne Barnes and Herndon DeWayne Jones
Defendant:
B Byrd, Tulsa County Sheriff Department, Aaron Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
