Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Fleming v. Coulter, et al
as 11-4067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL STANLEY FLEMING
Defendant - Appellee:
MEL COULTER, Captain, Central Utah Correctional Facility, DARWIN JOHNSON, Corrections Officer, Central Utah Correctional Facility, TROY KENNEDY, Corrections Officer, Central Utah Correctional Officer and others
Leishman v. Patterson et al
as 2:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Leishman
Defendant:
Tom Patterson, Mike Haddon, Lowell Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gowers v. Haleen et al
as 2:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
David Karl Gowers
Defendant:
FNU Haleen, FNU Estey, Devon Blood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bomprezzi v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2009cv02943
Plaintiff:
Mel Bomprezzi
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. Clark et al
as 2:2009cv01038
Plaintiff:
Carl Stanley Fleming
Defendant:
Lowell Clark, Mel Coulter, Darwin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Green
as 09-1411
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALVIN GREEN, AKA Mel Dog
Ruston v. Church Of Jesus Christ Of, et al
as 08-4101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER DAY SAINTS, GORDON B. HINCKLEY, VICTOR JAMES RUSTON and others
Ruston v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2007cv00929
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Gordon B. Hinckley, Victor James Ruston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruston v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2006cv00526
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Gordon B. Hinckley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
