Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Muhammad v. Workman, et al
as 12-7080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AB'DULLAH LAMAR RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, TERRY CRENSHAW, Assistant Warden and BOB COMPTON, Food Service Supervisor
Abdullah v. Sammuels et al
as 1:2012cv02729
Plaintiff:
Imam Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
Sammuels, Berkbile, Gull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Abdullah v. Samuels et al
as 1:2012cv02501
Plaintiff:
Imam-Muhammad Mustafa Abdullah
Defendant:
Samuels, Williams, Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Abdullah v. Berkbil et al
as 1:2012cv02324
Petitioner:
Khalifa Imam Muhammad Abdullah
Respondent:
Berkbil, Chris, Renqal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Abdullah v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2012cv02277
Plaintiff:
Imam-Muhammad Abdullah
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Lappin et al
as 1:2012cv01826
Petitioner:
Khalifa Imam Muhammad Abdullah
Respondent:
Harley Lappin, Becky Bile, Chrss and others
Defendant:
Gonzelez and Finne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Muhammad v. Workman, et al
as 12-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AB'DULLAH LAMAR RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, TERRY CRENSHAW, Assistant Warden and BOB COMPTON, Food Service Supervisor
Muhammad v. Brackensiek et al
as 6:2012cv00144
Plaintiff:
Abdullah L.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Wayne Brackensiek, Terry Crenshaw and Bob Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Muhammad v. Workman et al
as 6:2012cv00094
Plaintiff:
Abdullah L.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Randall Workman, Terry Crenshaw and Bob Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.