Cases 31 - 40 of 49,549
Barrett v. New Mexico Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Robert Barrett
Defendant:
New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pickens v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Darrin Lynn Pickens
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Day et al
as 6:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Jones
Defendant:
Jeremy Day and Trisha Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Redd et al
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Manuel Alex Hernandez
Defendant:
Brian Redd, Bart Mortensen, Randall Honey and others
Interested Party:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Petitioner:
KEVIN K. OGDEN
Respondent:
NEIL TURNER, Warden, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Heide v. Kansas Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-3071
Plaintiff:
JAY STEVEN HEIDE
Defendant:
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF KANSAS, FNU CURRY and others
Merryfield v. Fleet, et al
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN J. MERRYFIELD
Defendant:
KELSEY FLEET, XAN BOWERSOX, PAM MIDDLETON and others
Maldonado v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Frankie Maldonado
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chino v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Earl Chino
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico State Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lujan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
