Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Burns v. Buford, et al
as 11-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
STACEY BUFORD, JOHN DOE, Colorado Attorney General, R. N. WOLFF and others
Burns v. Buford, et al
as 11-1260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
STACEY BUFORD, JOHN DOE, Colorado Attorney General, R. N. WOLFF and others
Fife, et al v. Moore, et al
as 11-7033
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFF FIFE, TED TIGER, JESS HARJOCHEE and others
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICK E. MOORE, RODERICH WIEMER and MARCY MOORE
Cordova v. Dowling et al
as 1:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Cordova
Defendant:
Ray Dowling, Ted Laurence, T. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fife, et al v. Moore, et al
as 11-7031
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFF FIFE, TED TIGER, JESS HARJOCHEE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK E. MOORE, RODERICH WIEMER and MARCY MOORE
Fife et al v. Moore et al
as 6:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jeff Fife , Ted Tiger , Jess Harjochee and others
Defendant:
Patrick E. Moore , Marcy Moore and Roderich Wiemer
Cause Of Action: Habeas Corpus - Indian Civil Rights Act (detention)
Fresquez v. Wooley et al
as 1:2011cv00915
Plaintiff:
Leroy Damasio Fresquez
Defendant:
Todd Wooley, J. Brunn, Sittner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2011cv00422
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Hicks
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriff's Department, Ted Minks, Renfro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Chafonte et al
as 1:2010cv02721
Petitioner:
Ted Robert Jones
Respondent:
Chafonte, Sewell, Delta County Combined Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burns v. Buford et al
as 1:2010cv02691
Plaintiff:
Douglas Burns
Defendant:
Stacey Buford, Colorado Attorney General, R. N. Wolff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
