Cases 71 - 80 of 110
Luginbyhl v. Klahr et al
as 4:2015cv00517
Defendant:
Tony Klahr, Mark H Harper, Jack P Wells and others
Plaintiff:
Levi McRae Luginbyhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv03193
Plaintiff:
LaToyin V. Davis
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., (fnu) Maye, (fnu) Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Needham v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2015cv00250
Plaintiff:
Aaron David Trent Needham
Defendant:
State of Utah, Mark L. Shurtleff, John Swallow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carbajal, et al v. Keefer, et al
as 14-1203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTORIA CARBAJAL, DEAN CARBAJAL and LUIS LEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCHELL R. MORRISSEY, JEFFREY WATTS, ROBERT FULLER and others
Starks v. New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute et al
as 1:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Gordon Starks
Defendant:
New Mexico Behavioral Health Institute, Mohammed Khafaja, Christa Belt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Well
as 13-4160
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVEN MICHAEL WELLS
Daskalakis v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
Basile Daskalakis
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Garfield County of, Mary Fallin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wells v. USA
as 1:2012cv00256
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Wells
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Carbajal et al v. Morrissey et al
as 1:2012cv03231
Plaintiff:
Victoria Carbajal, Dean Carbajal and Luis Leal
Defendant:
Mitchell R. Morrissey, Mitchell (I) R. Morrissey, Jeffrey Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan et al v. Clements et al
as 1:2012cv00936
Plaintiff:
John Morgan , Dustin Cook , Paul Stark and others
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Jeffrey Wells, Jim Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
