Cases 81 - 90 of 780
Head v. Zook
as 5:2022cv00339
Petitioner:
Charles Head
Respondent:
K Zook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Oscar et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jean E Oscar, Katherine Wenzel, Wendy Lacey and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Mocospace, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Nathan K Williams
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Betty Guffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00182
Plaintiff:
Virgil Hall
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Utah, Washington County Purgatory Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. Kautz, et al
as 22-1083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY INGRAM
Defendant / Appellee:
T. KAUTZ, JANE DOE, R.N. whose true name is unknown, K. NEWCOMBE and others
Creech v. Nunn
as 4:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Bryon K Creech
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harvey v. Lisac et al
as 1:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel J. Harvey, III
Defendant:
Lisac, Thompson, Brandt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calbart v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
Ernie Calbart
Defendant:
Jackson, K. Jones, Carrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pettigrew, et al
as 22-6015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONE M. JOHNSON, a/k/a Marylin Monae Porter
Defendant / Appellee:
LUKE PETTIGREW, Interim Warden, A. MONDEN, Unit Manager, LEO BROWN and others
It v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Anthony K It, Anthony Nkefiah and Anthony Bryant
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
