Cases 81 - 90 of 2,030
Gaines v. Spitner et al
as 6:2023cv00390
Plaintiff:
Trevon D. Gaines
Defendant:
Mrs. Spitner, Mrs. Birdshead, Mr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Keyes
as 2:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Paul D Carr
Defendant:
Eileen M Keyes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luton (ID 36921) v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2023cv03231
Petitioner:
John D. Luton
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hill v. Stephens County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Juan Demetrius Hill and Juan-D Hill
Defendant:
Stephens County Sheriff, Oklahoma Attorney General, Govenor Kevin Stitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00902
Plaintiff:
Bryce Franklin
Defendant:
D. Jackson, Mathew Montoya, Timothy Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Harrell (PS) v. Roybal et al
as 1:2023cv02481
Plaintiff:
Salina Rose Harrell
Defendant:
Joseph J. Roybal, Santum, Gillette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robbins (PS) v. No Named Repondent
as 1:2023cv02529
Petitioner:
Edward D. Robbins
Respondent:
No Named Repondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Dickens
as 23-8064
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MOSES D. DICKENS, III
Ford v. Buss
as 5:2023cv00856
Petitioner:
Marcus D Ford
Respondent:
David Buss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
