Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Johnson v. Calloway, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
GEOFFREY CALLOWAY, JENNIFER JONES, PHILLIP WIESER and others
Johnson (PS) v. Calloway et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Geoffrey Calloway, Jennifer Jones, Philip Wieser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Clark, et al
as 24-1015
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
GILLIAN CLARK, MICHAEL HEGARTY, PAUL WIESE and others
Johnson v. Johnson, et al
as 24-1007
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHNSON, MOSES STANCIL, PLANNEL and others
Stetzel (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv03432
Plaintiff:
Philip E. Stetzel
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Siobhan Burtlow, Hannah Feldhacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson (PS) v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv03422
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Gillian Clark, Michael Hegarty, Paul Wiese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson (PS) v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv03369
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Johnson, Moses Stancil, Plannel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Bailey
as 6:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Landon Taylor and Dontaye King
Defendant:
James Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Jefferson
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, Moses (I) Andre Stancil, Chris Lobanov-Rostovsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godel et al v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
David R. Godel and William J. Lomax
Defendant:
Moses Andre Stancil, James Bailey, Shannon Folz and others
Interested Party:
CASE MANAGER FOR David R. Godel and CASE MANAGER FOR William J. Lomax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
