Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03204
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader and Craig James Strader
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sam A. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2019cv03218
Defendant:
(fnu) Echols, (fnu) Galloway, (fnu) Byers and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Olivera v. Cate et al
as 5:2014cv00162
Plaintiff:
Angel Olivera
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Scott Kernan, Terri McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Standifird, et al
as 11-5126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH M. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE STANDIFIRD, Warden, TERRY JENKS, Exec. Dir., J. D. DANIELS, Dep. Dir. and others
Blum v. Clements et al
as 1:2011cv02257
Plaintiff:
James F. Blum
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Travis (I) Trani, Travis Trani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ballard v. Franklin, et al
as 11-6191
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH WAYNE BALLARD
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC FRANKLIN, JIM RABON, Sentence Administrator, TERRY JENKS, Executive Director and others
Thompson v. Daniels et al
as 5:2011cv00427
Plaintiff:
Gary R Thompson
Defendant:
J D Daniels, Lynnell Harkins, Susan B Loving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Franklin et al
as 5:2011cv00400
Petitioner:
Donald Wayne Smith
Respondent:
Eric Franklin, Terry Jenks, J D Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ballard v. Franklin et al
as 5:2011cv00310
Petitioner:
Kenneth W Ballard
Respondent:
Eric Franklin , Jim Rabon, Terry Jenks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Standifird et al
as 4:2011cv00163
Plaintiff:
Joseph M Jackson
Defendant:
Jane Standifird, Terry Jenks, J D Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
