Cases 1 - 10 of 733
Garcia v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO, COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, C.S.P.D. Officer and others
Mendez v. The New Mexico Corrections Department et al
as 2:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Mario A Mendez
Defendant:
The New Mexico Corrections Department, Geo Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merryfield v. Fleet, et al
as 24-3070
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN J. MERRYFIELD
Defendant:
KELSEY FLEET, XAN BOWERSOX, PAM MIDDLETON and others
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Hollaway (PS) v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01016
Petitioner:
Brian Don Hollaway
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cordova (PS) v. Doe
as 1:2024cv01008
Petitioner:
Louis M. Cordova
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez (PS) v. John Doe #1
as 1:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amphly v. State of New Mexico et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Amphly
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Michelle Lujan Grisham, Alisha Tafoya Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez (PS) v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El (PS) v. Centennial State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Centennial State Prison, State of Colorado, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
