Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Strobel v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv03105
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Robert Strobel
Defendant:
United States of America, (fnu) Lepe, (fnu) Boulware and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. HealthCore United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
HealthCore United States of America, 111-SeaFence HCM Resources CHP, North Side NSM and Usitalianusim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bridges v. Lancaster et al
as 1:2021cv00241
Defendant:
United States and M. Lancaster
Plaintiff:
John Clark Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Lancaster et al
as 1:2020cv00311
Defendant:
Lancaster, Boze and Anderson
Plaintiff:
Edgar Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Russell et al
as 5:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
Djuan Preston Williams
Defendant:
Norm Russell, Rick Marsh, Orio Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Lancaster
as 16-6021
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
REGINALD A. LANCASTER
Lancaster v. Straightline et al
as 1:2015cv02852
Plaintiff:
Brett E. Lancaster
Defendant:
Straightline, Steven Reams, Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Been v. Edwards et al
as 5:2014cv00203
Plaintiff:
Arthur L Been, Jr
Defendant:
Randall R Edwards, Robert Stuart, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv00974
Movant:
Reginald A Lancaster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cantu v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2013cv01500
Plaintiff:
Monte Cantu
Defendant:
Executive Director of CDOC, Rae Timme, Justin McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
