Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Reyes et al v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Damon Reyes, Michael Martin, Michael Encinias and others
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens, Jacob O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cline v. Kansas City, Kansas Police Department et al
as 5:2020cv03136
Defendant:
Christopher Blake, Chad Cowher, Andrew Seal and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Deshawn Cline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto et al v. Governor of the State of New Mexico, et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Petitioner:
Patrick Hopkins, Dainte D Sanders, Jonathan Duran and others
Respondent:
Governor of the State of New Mexico and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gilkey v. Willard et al
as 1:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
Steven Gilkey
Defendant:
David Willard, Michael Martin, Tim Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Northeastern New Mexico Detention Facility, et al.
as 2:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Silva
Defendant:
Northeastern New Mexico Detention Facility, New Mexico Department of Corrections, David Willard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skidgel v. Martin et al
as 1:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
Clifton Skidgel
Defendant:
Michael Martin , Sherry Phillips and Corrections Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Sockey et al
as 6:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
W.A. Sockey, Amanda Workman, Vickie Harless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barela Duran v. Martin
as 1:2008cv00034
Plaintiff:
David Barela Duran
Defendant:
Michael Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Martin et al
as 1:2007cv00670
Plaintiff:
James C Rogers
Defendant:
Michael Martin and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
