Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Black v. Christian et al
as 6:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Preston Miles Black
Defendant:
John Christian, Unknown or all other Contractors, Pontotoc County Court Clerk's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Taylor et al
as 5:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Isom Daniel Rogers, III
Defendant:
P D Taylor, Captain FNU Sedbrook, FNU Sedbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Weaver et al
as 5:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
John James Williams
Defendant:
FNU Weaver, Warden Luke Pettigrew, Joseph Harp Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bench v. Farris
as 5:2022cv00066
Petitioner:
Miles Sterling Bench
Respondent:
Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Allen v. Pettigrew et al
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Miles Allen
Defendant:
Luke Pettigrew and Judy Windsor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan et al v. United States et al
as 5:2021cv01030
Petitioner:
David Brian Morgan, Earnest Draper, Earnest Moncada and others
Respondent:
United States and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Couwrtney v. Miles
as 5:2020cv01164
Plaintiff:
Tracy E Couwrtney and Tracy E Courtney
Defendant:
Dr. FNU Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv00494
Plaintiff:
Warren Stewart, Cleve Billings, Brian Cash and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Republic of China, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Miles et al
as 5:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Carl Bear, Mike McDougal, Terri Simple and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Blake Washington, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Musgraves v. Fox
as 5:2017cv00241
Petitioner:
Miles Musgraves
Respondent:
John Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
