Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Winfrey v. Louthan
as 5:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
Ted James Winfrey
Respondent:
David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnett v. Heaton et al
as 5:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Jason Wade Burnett
Respondent:
Ted Heaton, Paul Kitzke and Clint Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Price v. Robeson et al
as 5:2023cv03065
Plaintiff:
John Timothy Price
Defendant:
Corey Robeson and Ted G. Baird
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Stitt et al
as 5:2022cv00302
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Amber Martin, Mark Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2021cv00577
Defendant:
Wellpath Inc, FNU Smith, Rita Hood and others
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oblad v. Parrish et al
as 2:2020cv00732
Defendant:
Sean Reyes, Judge Dee Benson, SLC Metro Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Oblad
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Polis et al
as 1:2020cv01758
Defendant:
Charles Kudlavskas, K. Frankmore, Michelle Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Chad O'Neal Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. CCA Core Civic et al
as 1:2020cv01608
Plaintiff:
Ted Allen
Defendant:
Barry Goodrich, Executive Director for the Department of Corrections and CCA Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Gateway Foundation Inc et al
as 1:2019cv00248
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Case Manager Ramero, Gateway Foundation Inc Employee Kidd, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Shimel, Robert S Thornley, Keipher A Loos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
