Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Wade v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1101
Petitioner:
CHARLES FREDERICK WADE
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Burnett v. Heaton et al
as 5:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Jason Wade Burnett
Respondent:
Ted Heaton, Paul Kitzke and Clint Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wade (PS) v. Fairbairn et al
as 1:2023cv03185
Petitioner:
Charles Frederick Wade
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lay v. Quick
as 23-7085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIE QUICK, Warden at O.S.P.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marisa v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office, The et al
as 1:2023cv02554
Plaintiff:
Wade Marisa and Marisa Wade
Defendant:
Douglas County Board of Commissioners, Douglas County Colorado Sheriff, Douglas County Colorado Sheriff Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc - Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Lay v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
Wade Lay
Respondent:
Christie Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Quick
as 5:2023cv00858
Plaintiff:
Wade Lay
Defendant:
Christie Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eddy v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00690
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Brian Wade Eddy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Middlebrooks (PS) v. Lewis et al
as 1:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Middlebrook and Charles Robert Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Dean Willams, Jaques, Redman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
