Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,534
Hurst v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00209
Petitioner: Shaun Lovell Franklin Hurst
Defendant: Steven Harpe, Rick Williams and Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bellamy (ID 53454) v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv03102
Plaintiff: Ronnie Allen Bellamy, Jr.
Defendant: Aramark Corporation, (fnu) Zmuda, (fnu) Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhl v. Williams
as 24-3084
Petitioner: TYLER A. RUHL
Respondent: TOMMY WILLIAMS
Dressel (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC) et al
as 1:2024cv01628
Plaintiff: Spencer Dressel
Defendant: Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC), Moses Andre Stancil, Jeff Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Williams
as 24-3079
Petitioner: NICHOLAS COX
Respondent: TOMMY WILLIAMS
Stacey v. Kellough et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff: Oren Stacey
Defendant: William Kellough and Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett (ID 86695) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03092
Plaintiff: Paul Lawrence Barnett
Defendant: Jeff Zmuda, Tommy Williams, Dana L. Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner: Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent: William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Hudson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv03087
Plaintiff: Derrick S. Walker
Defendant: D. Hudson, (fnu) Walker, (fnu) Sargent and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rankins
as 24-6109
Petitioner: DAVID L. JACKSON
Respondent: WILLIAM "CHRIS" RANKINS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?