Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Clarke v. Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2012cv01094
Plaintiff:
Tibal Clarke
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center, John Doe, L Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2012cv00577
Plaintiff:
Tibal Clarke
Defendant:
Federal Transfer Center, John Doe, L Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winkler v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2012cv01089
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mandel Winkler
Defendant:
John W. Hickenlooper and The Employees of the State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winkler v. Wilson et al
as 1:2011cv03324
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mandel Winkler
Defendant:
Robert (I) Dick, Robert Dick, Bradshaw (I) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winkler v. Mullarky, et al
as 11-1098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN MANDEL WINKLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY J. MULLARKY, GREGORY J. HOBB, JR., ALEX J. MARTINEZ, Justice and others
Winkler v. AG of State of Colorado, et al
as 10-1554
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN MANDEL WINKLER
Respondent - Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections
Winkler v. Mullarky et al
as 1:2010cv02249
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mandel Winkler
Defendant:
Mary J. Mullarky, Gregory J. Hobb, Jr., Alex J. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winkler v. People of the State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2010cv02124
Petitioner:
Shawn Mandel Winkler
Respondent:
People of the State of Colorado, The and Aristedes W. Zavaras
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pruitt v. Winkler
as 6:2008cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Pruitt
Defendant:
Tom Winkler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallin v. Arapahoe County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2007cv02213
Plaintiff:
Oloyea Wallin
Defendant:
Arapahoe County Detention Facility, Robinson, Lauderdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
