Cases 1 - 10 of 2,520
Williams v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
John K Williams
Respondent:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shook v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00489
Petitioner:
Michael Sean Shook
Respondent:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walking Eagle (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01372
Petitioner:
Kevin Walking Eagle
Respondent:
J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nelson (PS) v. Hart et al
as 1:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
William Hart, Midge Barton and Adam Murdie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant:
Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Hensley et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hensley, Domenique Sedillo, Gabriel Perez and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ryan T. Armstrong
Respondent:
William Chris Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Stancil
as 24-1168
Petitioner:
NORMAN WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
Puana (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01088
Petitioner:
Rudolph Puana
Respondent:
J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
