Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,534
Hurst v. Harpe et al
as 6:2024cv00209
Petitioner: Shaun Lovell Franklin Hurst
Defendant: Steven Harpe, Rick Williams and Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bellamy (ID 53454) v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv03102
Plaintiff: Ronnie Allen Bellamy, Jr.
Defendant: Aramark Corporation, (fnu) Zmuda, (fnu) Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruhl v. Williams
as 24-3084
Petitioner: TYLER A. RUHL
Respondent: TOMMY WILLIAMS
Omar et al (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff: Ellu M. Omar, Demetrius M. Wallace, Jerren R. Pack and others
Defendant: Diggins, Line, Bruning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puana v. Williams
as 1:2024cv01088
Petitioner: Rudolph Puana
Respondent: J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norman v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00182
Petitioner: Marcell Jeron Norman
Respondent: William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams (PS) v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01107
Petitioner: Nathaniel Williams
Respondent: Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. F. Williams, A. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cox v. Williams
as 24-3079
Petitioner: NICHOLAS COX
Respondent: TOMMY WILLIAMS
Dressel (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC) et al
as 1:2024cv01628
Plaintiff: Spencer Dressel
Defendant: Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC), Moses Andre Stancil, Jeff Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacey v. Kellough et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff: Oren Stacey
Defendant: William Kellough and Tulsa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?