Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 8,151
In re: Adams, et al
as 24-4026
Petitioner: LARRY ADAMS, JED R. CHRISTENSEN, KIRK R. HARRISON and others
Respondent: ROY NIELSEN HAFEN and WILLIAM T. THURMAN
Martinez v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff: ELSIE RUTH MARTINEZ
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foster v. Williams et al
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff: Carolyn Foster
Defendant: Herbert Williams and Western Dairy Transport, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moon v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00240
Plaintiff: Chesley Moon
Defendant: Chad Richison, Henry C. Duques, Robert J. Levenson and others
Cosgray v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff: David William Cosgray
Defendant: Social Security Administration and Billy Massingill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Mulder
as 24-5027
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM BRIAN MULDER, AKA Bill Mulder
Thomsen v. Armfield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00226
Plaintiff: William C Thomsen
Defendant: Cory Armfield and New Cordell City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrasco (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00611
Petitioner: Brandon Lee Carrasco
Respondent: J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barrow (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00613
Petitioner: Donnell Barrow
Respondent: J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grant v. Aragon We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff: William Grant
Defendant: Isaac Aragon
Intervenor: City of Albuquerque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?