Cases 151 - 160 of 236
Darden v. Wilkinson
as 5:2013cv00392
Petitioner:
Charles Darden
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darden v. Wilkinson
as 6:2013cv00150
Petitioner:
Charles Darden
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Wilkinson et al
as 6:2013cv00140
Plaintiff:
Christopher Olen Baker
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson, D Castro, Kathy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Wilkinson et al
as 5:2013cv00249
Petitioner:
Octavious Hodges
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goudeau v. Wilkinson et al
as 5:2013cv00241
Petitioner:
Mozell Paul Goudeau
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goudeau v. Wilkinson et al
as 5:2013cv00240
Petitioner:
Mozell Paul Goudeau
Respondent:
Tim Wilkinson and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Wilkinson et al
as 5:2013cv00190
Plaintiff:
Christopher Olen Baker
Defendant:
Tim Wilkinson, D Castro and Kathy Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gist v. Jones et al
as 5:2013cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jewel Wesley Gist
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Rebecca Adams, Tim Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Jones, et al
as 13-7002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, TIM WILKINSON and BRIAN WIDEMAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.