Cases 161 - 170 of 1,451
Stone Well Service v. Paradox Upstream
as 4:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Stone Well Service
Defendant:
Paradox Upstream and CCI Paradox Upstream
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hirsh v. Sunflower Wellness Retreat, L.L.C. et al.
as 6:2021cv01291
Plaintiff:
James Adam Hirsh
Defendant:
Sunflower Wellness Retreat, L.L.C. and Pathways Holdings L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Bar Method Franchisor LLC v. Henderhiser LLC et al
as 1:2021cv03357
Plaintiff:
The Bar Method Franchisor LLC
Defendant:
Henderhiser LLC, Bravence Wellness Collective LLC and Laura E. Henderson
M Welles and Associates, Inc. v. Edwell, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03342
Plaintiff:
M Welles and Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Edwell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Henard v. Shradder
as 1:2021cv03123
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Henard
Respondent:
Jeff Shradder
Defendant:
Well Path Medical Services, Monica L. Alberts, Jamie Xiong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hart v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2021cv01077
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Security Administration, Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lerch Bates, Inc. v. Alvin
as 1:2021cv02910
Plaintiff:
Lerch Bates, Inc.
Defendant:
Lloyd Alvin
Interested Party:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 d
Lerch Bates, Inc. v. Alvin
as 1:2021cv02898
Plaintiff:
Lerch Bates, Inc.
Defendant:
Lloyd Alvin
Interested Party:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 d
Smith et al v. Welle-Powell et al
as 1:2021cv02667
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith, Nazariah Smith and Zakye Smith
Defendant:
Deborah Lynn Welle-Powell and Kenneth Aggus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
