Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Griffin v. (LNU), et al
as 11-3234
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
FNU LNU, Regional Director of the Board of Prisons, ERIC HOLDER, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Griffin v. (LNU), et al
as 11-3181
Petitioner - Appellant:
ERIC GRIFFIN
Respondent - Appellee:
FNU LNU, Regional Director of the Board of Prisons, ERIC HOLDER, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Marquez Pedregon v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 1:2011cv00266
Plaintiff:
Marco Marquez Pedregon
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Hussein Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kinnell v. U.S. District Court Judges, et al
as 10-3259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROLLY O. KINNELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CLERKS, STATE COURTS OF KANSAS and others
Riches v. Riches, et al
as 10-1277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, AKA Bernard Madoff, AKA Howard Stern, DBA Irving Picard
Defendant - Appellee:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES, JAMES WENNEKER VON BRUNN, ERIC HOLDER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Knox v. Aldridge, et al
as 10-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA ALDRIDGE, D & E Unit Manager, OSP, AMY THOMAS, D Unit Case Manager, OSP, BRIAN HOLDEN, D Unit Mental Health Officer, OSP and others
Henderson v. Obama
as 10-2118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID E. HENDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, Commander in Chief, President of the United States
Demos, Jr. v. United States, et al
as 10-7032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF WASHINGTON, TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
