Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Knox v. Morgan, et al
as 11-6245
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTONE LAMANDINGO KNOX, AKA Antion L. Knox
Respondent - Appellee:
JOANN MORGAN, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, BOBBY BOONE and others
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Williams v. Warden et al
as 4:2011cv00264
Petitioner:
Mark Anthony Williams
Respondent:
Warden, Tulsa County District Court, Brad Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Berryhill v. Henry
as 11-5045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD HENRY, Governor
Clayton v. Henry et al
as 5:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
James E Clayton
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Mary Fallin, Justin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muscogee (Creek) v. Henry, et al
as 11-7005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, a federally-recognized Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD HENRY, Governor of Oklahoma, W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General, Attorney General of Oklahoma, OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION and others
Berryhill v. Henry
as 4:2010cv00775
Plaintiff:
Lavern Berryhill
Defendant:
Brad Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berryhill v. Vicki LaGrange, et al
as 10-6271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
VICKI MILES LAGRANGE, U.S. District Judge, LEE R. WEST, District Director, U.S. District Judge, ROBIN CAUTHRON, District Director, U.S. District Judge and others
Defendant:
DREW EDMONDSON, Asst AG
Knox v. Morgan et al
as 5:2010cv01274
Petitioner:
Antone L A Knox
Respondent:
JoAnn Morgan, Randall G Workman, Bobby Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Berryhill v. Greenway, et al
as 10-6225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERN BERRYHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
BESSIE GREENWAY, JUSTIN JONES, KERRY ANN KELLY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
